Brown or green field?

3 December 2012

I’m looking at a piece of land in a rural setting, very close to, but just outside the village boundary, and with easy vehicular access. I’m considering a planning application for a single dwelling, but think the chances are slim as the land is likely to be classed as greenfield by the planning authority. However, there are the remains of footings for two buildings (probably barns circa mid-1800s) and surface evidence of a small sand quarry. Could this land be classed as brownfield and would a planning application based on “restoring the original landscape” stand a reasonable chance of consideration?

Answers

The key issue is not so much whether the site is brown or green field, but whether it lies in or out of the village boundary as defined in the local plan. Since it’s outside, any proposal simply to build a new house will be up against strict policies of restraint. Sometimes restoring a brownfield site can be sufficient reason to overcome those policies. Government guidance defines what it actually calls “previously developed land” and excludes agricultural buildings or agricultural land. It also excludes sites where former buildings are so derelict as to have blended back into the landscape. The former barns, therefore, don’t help you. Unless the sand quarry had associated buildings that still remain, it doesn’t help you either because the definition only covers buildings and associated land. By all means check what your council’s planners think, but this appears something of a long shot.

3 December 2012

You may be interested in

Our sponsors